Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2005No. 2001AP2789 & 2002AP2979PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.

¶ 1. Ralph Armstrong seeks review of an unpublished court of appeals' decision that affirmed the circuit court's orders denying Armstrong's motions to vacate his judgment of conviction and for reconsideration. State v. Armstrong, Nos. 2001AP2789 and 2002AP2979, unpublished slip, op., ¶ 1 (Wis. Ct. App. May 27, 2004). The court of appeals determined that newly obtained DNA tests that established Armstrong was not the donor of certain biological evidence found at a 1980 murder scene did not create a reasonable probability that the outcome would be different on retrial.

¶…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Morden v. Continental AGWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. McCallumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. DailyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Childers v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  3. State v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. AveryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. Dale R. NeumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API