Legal Opinion

Chicago Live Stock Commission Co. v. Fix

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Pottawatomie County; before B. P. Burwell, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

This was an action of replevin by tbe Chicago Live Stock Commission Company, plaintiff in error, against tbe defendant in error, Jesse Fix, to recover tbe possession of twenty-two bead of cattle. It was admitted upon the trial that the Chicago Live Stock Commission Company, loaned to Hines & Hinkley the sum of money alleged in the plaintiff’s petition, and that said Hines & Hinkley, to secure said Joan, executed and delivered to the plaintiff in error a chattel mortgage upon a herd of cattle, which included the cattle involved in this action. It was further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. VolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Morisette v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bouton v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Baumgart v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Carpenter v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Kenyon v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API