Legal Opinion

Morisette v. Howard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1901No. 11,812PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Oloud district court; F. W. Stubges, judge. In banc.

1Opinion of the Court

*464The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This action was brought by W. H. Howard, as trustee, to recover possession of a stock of merchandise from A. Morisette, sheriff of Cloud county, who had seized it as the property of the Clyde Mercantile Company, at the instance of the creditors of that company. After the action was.begun Fannie L. Holman intervened, and alleged that she had previously purchased and paid for the merchandise, and was the actual owner and entitled to the possession of the same. The creditors of the mercantile company, through the sheriff, claimed that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holmes & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. Holmes & Wessell Metal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Craig v. FrazierIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Douglass v. GeilerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Alexandria, Arcadia & Fort Smith Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Bradford v. Western Irrigating Canal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  2. Harris v. Independence Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Malone v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Anderson v. Shawnee Compress Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Chicago Live Stock Commission Co. v. FixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API