Legal Opinion

Grant v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1927No. 6,000PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Toole

This action is for damages for personal injuries received by-plaintiff in a railroad crossing collision. The pleadings admit the corporate entity of defendant company and its engagement in the business of owning and operating a railway system as a common carrier in the state of Montana and other states; that a portion of this system extended through Fergus county, Montana, and the existence of a public highway, crossing over the line of the railway between the station of Denton and Hoosae in that county; that the defendant company owned, maintained and operated, in the carrying on of its…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Lee v. Stockmen's National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mullery v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Autio v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Phoenix Refining Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Carlson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ineas v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API