State v. Heredia-Juarez
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Miguel Angel Heredia-Juarez was convicted of rape in the first degree. Heredia-Juarez argues that his right to a speedy trial was violated when the trial court granted the State’s motion for a continuance to accommodate the prosecutor’s prescheduled vacation and a delay in receiving deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) results. Heredia-Juarez argues that the State had an affirmative duty to reassign the case to another deputy when the originally assigned prosecutor was unavailable. Reassignment, however, is not a per se requirement in order for the State to obtain a continuance. A preplanned vacation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. FlinnWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FlinnWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ChichesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. ChichesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State Of Washington v. Arvell L. KindellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.