Legal Opinion

State v. Heredia-Juarez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 17, 2003No. 51146-7-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Miguel Angel Heredia-Juarez was convicted of rape in the first degree. Heredia-Juarez argues that his right to a speedy trial was violated when the trial court granted the State’s motion for a continuance to accommodate the prosecutor’s prescheduled vacation and a delay in receiving deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) results. Heredia-Juarez argues that the State had an affirmative duty to reassign the case to another deputy when the originally assigned prosecutor was unavailable. Reassignment, however, is not a per se requirement in order for the State to obtain a continuance. A preplanned vacation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FlinnWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. FlinnWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. ChichesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. ChichesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State Of Washington v. Arvell L. KindellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API