Legal Opinion

State v. Flinn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2005No. 75092-1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*196¶1 Anthony Oren Flinn appeals his conviction for possession of an incendiary device. Flinn alleges that the trial court abused its discretion by granting a continuance beyond the time for trial period and by considering the judicial conference in deciding the length of the continuance. We hold that the trial judge granted the continuance for good cause — the State’s need to prepare for Flinn’s diminished capacity defense — and that five weeks was a reasonable period of time to continue the trial under the circumstances of this case.

Fairhurst, J.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 On the morning…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. IniguezWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. IniguezWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. FlinnWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. KenyonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. KenyonWashington Supreme Court · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API