Legal Opinion

United States v. Joan M. Noske

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2000No. 00-2167PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Joan M. Noske and her brother were convicted of tax evasion in a joint proceeding. Noske appealed her 78-month sentence, and we affirmed. See United States v. Noske, 117 F.3d 1053 (8th Cir.1997). After her pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition failed, Noske’s brother obtained habeas relief resulting in a reduction of his sentence to 78 months, the same sentence that Noske received. Because § 2255 precludes Noske from filing a second petition under that statute attacking her sentence, Noske seeks reconsideration of her sentence again through a writ of error coram nobis under the All Writs Act, see…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Rickie S. Zabel v. United States AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Ervin KindleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Keith Baranski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. George Lemark PattonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Juan v. GroweMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. United States v. RiceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API