Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 8, 2003No. 03-6975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Alfred Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Although the district court resolved Smith’s claims on the merits, a writ of error coram nobis is available only when the petitioner is not in custody. See, e.g., United States v. Sawyer, 239 F.3d 31, 37 (1st Cir.2001). As Smith is in federal custody by virtue of his supervised release status, see United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 283 (4th Cir.1999), he is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. George Lloyd PregentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Sawyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Joan M. NoskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. USA - 2255District Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API