Legal Opinion

United States v. Rice

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided August 2, 2005No. 3:04-cv-00139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PRATT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Defendant Darwin G. Rice’s Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Jury Verdict and Request for Hearing in Nature of Coram Nobis (Clerk’s No. 69). 1 In his motion, the Defendant requests that the Court issue the common law writ of coram nobis which, in effect, would vacate the jury verdict reached in this case and allow a new trial on the grounds that the Defendant, at trial, was served by ineffective counsel.

On October 6, 2004, the Defendant was found guilty by jury verdict of one count of making a false statement of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Njai v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
  2. Phuc Kin Tran v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API