Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Weber

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1869PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court. I. The ordinance 5,434, relating to markets, is invalid, because unreasonable and not warranted by the charter in force when it was passed. (Commissioners v. Gras Co., 12 Penn. St. 318 ; Mayor of Hudson v. Thorne, 7 Paige, 261; 3 Pick. 462.) H. If the city council had power under the charter of March 3, 1851, to prohibit or suppress meat shops, the power to prohibit was taken away by the charter of March 19, 1866 (Sess.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court. I. The ordinance 5,434, relating to markets, is invalid, because unreasonable and not warranted by the charter in force when it was passed. (Commissioners v. Gras Co., 12 Penn. St. 318 ; Mayor of Hudson v. Thorne, 7 Paige, 261; 3 Pick. 462.) H. If the city council had power under the charter of March 3, 1851, to prohibit or suppress meat shops, the power to prohibit was taken away by the charter of March 19, 1866 (Sess. Acts 1866, p. 284, clause 2), amending the charter of 1851, and the present charter, approved March 13, 1867 (in clause 2, p. 63, Sess.…

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

Defendant was fined for keeping a meat shop within the market limits, or limits within which meat shops are prohibited by the ordinances of St. Louis. Ordinance No. 5,434, in relation to markets, approved September 6, 1864, provided, by section 5, article 5, that “No person, not being the lessee of a butcher’s *549stall, shall sell or offer for sale in market, or in any other place, any fresh meat in less quantities than one quarter.” Section 1, of art. 8, of the same ordinance authorizes meat shops to he licensed in the extended new limits of the city, hut not within four blocks of any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ash v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. City of Saint Paul v. LaidlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  3. City of Davenport v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  4. Bush v. SeaburyNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  5. Village of Buffalo v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1833

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Van Hook v. City of SelmaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. City of Tarkio v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. State v. McKinneyMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API