State v. Roy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Concurrence
THISSEN, Justice (concurring).
I concur in the decision that appellant Misty Roy is not entitled to jail credit on her 2011 third-degree controlled-substance conviction for the time she spent in the custody of the Red Lake Nation in 2017. I agree that the time spent in the custody of the Red Lake Nation was not "in connection with" the 2011 third-degree controlled-substance conviction. Accordingly, Roy is not entitled to jail credit under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 4(B) (stating that a criminal defendant is entitled to custody credit for time spent in custody "in connection with the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. DulskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. PatricelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.