Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Roy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2019No. A18-0326Published

1Concurrence

THISSEN, Justice (concurring).

I concur in the decision that appellant Misty Roy is not entitled to jail credit on her 2011 third-degree controlled-substance conviction for the time she spent in the custody of the Red Lake Nation in 2017. I agree that the time spent in the custody of the Red Lake Nation was not "in connection with" the 2011 third-degree controlled-substance conviction. Accordingly, Roy is not entitled to jail credit under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 4(B) (stating that a criminal defendant is entitled to custody credit for time spent in custody "in connection with the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. DulskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. PatricelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API