Legal Opinion

Warren v. Joeckel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1982No. F 721; No. D 17-592; CA A22433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

These two cases were consolidated for trial and on appeal and involve the paternity and custody of a child born to Pamela Joeckel (wife) but conceived before her marriage to Mark Joeckel (husband). Husband appeals a decree in the paternity case declaring Grant Warren to be the father of the child and the part of the decree in the dissolution case that awarded custody of the child to wife and Warren and denied husband visitation. We affirm.

In early 1978, while still single, wife was living with husband; she moved out in April to rent a room in Warren’s house. She established a sexual…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. American Timber & Trading Co. v. NiedermeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Burke v. BurkeOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dahlhammer & Roelfs v. SchneiderOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Clackamas Fire Protection District No. 1 v. Oregon Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. WeemsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. In re the Marriage of MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Chevron Pipe Line Co. v. De RoestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Chevron Pipe Line Co. v. De RoestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API