Legal Opinion

Myers v. Weems

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1994No. 16-92-08199; CA A80446PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment setting aside a deed. On de novo review, we affirm.

Defendant is plaintiffs daughter. In 1986, the parties executed and recorded a deed purporting to create joint ownership of real property that plaintiff had owned individually. The parties agree that defendant did not give any consideration for the transfer. In 1992, plaintiff brought this action, seeking to cancel the deed. The trial court granted judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s conclusion that plaintiffs claim was not barred by laches. “The elements of laches are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ellis v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Halleck v. HALLECKOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Johnson v. SteenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Rise v. SteckelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Howell v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brousseau v. BrousseauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Ferer v. Aaron Ferer & Sons Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hilterbrand v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Brousseau v. BrousseauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API