Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Moore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1997No. 94DO-0062-MS; CA A91175PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Husband appeals a dissolution judgment, assigning error to the trial court’s award of custody and child support. We review de novo and reverse.

In August 1990, while still single, wife and husband had sexual relations. Wife was 17, and husband was 18 years old. After she learned that she was pregnant, wife applied to Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) for public assistance. As part of her application, wife filed an affidavit asserting that husband was the father of the child and that he was the only man with whom she had had sexual relations within 30 days before or after the time of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lewis & Clark College v. Bureau of LaborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. In re the Marriage of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. In Matter of Marriage of BoldtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of Holcomb and HolcombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of UwimanaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. In re the Marriage of SugarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. In Re the Marriage of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API