Legal Opinion

Dahlhammer & Roelfs v. Schneider

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1953PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a suit to cancel certain instruments of conveyance and to impress a trust upon the lands therein described, and for other relief, brought by George F. Dahlhammer and Edith R. Roelfs, as plaintiffs, against Bert E. Boice and Jane Doe Boice, husband and wife, and Comte & Kohlman Co., a corporation, as defendants. Two parcels of land are involved, both located in Multnomah county, Oregon, one designated as tract No. 1 and containing 15.54 acres, and the other designated as tract No. 2 and containing 8.9308 acres. The two tracts are contiguous. A decree was entered in favor of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. FOUCHEK v. JanicekOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re Knutson's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Acton v. LambersonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Anderson, Adm. v. CloughOregon Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Stephan v. Equitable Savings and Loan AssociationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Albino v. AlbinoOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Willis v. StagerOregon Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API