Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1941No. 9544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order adjudicating the appellants guilty of contempt of court. The appellants, New Mexico water users of the waters of the Gila River, were charged with having violated the in-junctive feature of a decree of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona affecting and defining the water rights of the United States and of the several defendants in the waters of Gila River in Arizona and New Mexico. The facts are not in dispute. The main defense presented by the appellants was the assertion that the court had no jurisdiction to make…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Federal Facilities Realty Trust v. KulpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  3. Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  4. Tilghman v. TilghmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1944
  5. Elwood v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API