Legal Opinion

Tilghman v. Tilghman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 2, 1944No. Civil Action 14800PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, Justice.

This is a motion to adjudge defendant in contempt for failure to pay permanent alimony awarded in a judgment for absolute divorce, for allowance of counsel fees for services rendered subsequent to final judgment, and for money judgment for the total arrearages of alimony. Defendant, purporting to appear specially, has moved to quash service of the motion above referred to on the ground that it was made outside the territorial jurisdiction of this court, and ineffective to acquire jurisdiction over the person of defendant, and on the further ground that contempt proceedings,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. CurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Rio Grande Irrigation & Colonization Co. v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Balchen v. BalchenAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Thomas v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hayes v. HayesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. VTR, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  5. Caplow v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API