Legal Opinion
Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 15, 1932No. 332PublishedCited by 266 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
This is a contempt proceeding against the respondent, Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Company, for violation of a permanent injunction granted in an infringement suit.
In that .suit, which was brought by the respondent, a Michigan corporation, in the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the bill of complaint for the infringement of the respondent’s patents was dismissed and the counterclaim of the present petitioners for the infringement of their patent (Peterson patent No. 1,195,-266, for hinged lasts for shoes) was sustained. 300 Fed. 834. The decree, as modified, was…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by266 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.