Legal Opinion
Bronx Derrick & Tool Co. v. Porcupine Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 1, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff corporation is engaged in the business of selling and renting derricks and other apparatus used in the erection of steel structures. The defendant furnishes steel for building construction. Patrick F. Doody, in 1926, under the name of Doody Steel Erecting Company, was engaged in the business of erecting steel buildings. In the spring of 1926, these parties were engaged in furnishing and erecting steel in a building in New Britain.
The plaintiff brought this action in two counts; the first sought to recover on an order given by Doody on the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wells v. Hartford Manilla Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Bartholomew v. MuzzySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Reed v. HolcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
- Ball Electric Light Co. v. ChildSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Smith v. DelaneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Baydrop v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Dorne v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Bridge-Mile Shoe Corporation v. Liggett Drug Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Sugrue v. ChampionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.