Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Muzzy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 30, 1892PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Action to recover possession of real estate and for rents and profits; brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County, and tried to the court before J. M. Sail, J. Facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendants. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, J.

This is an action to recover the possession of certain real estate, brought by the plaintiff as administrator of one Lauren Byington, against the defendants as administrators of Julia P. Byington.

The facts found by the court below which bear upon the questions decided by this court on the appeal, are in substance the following: — From a time prior to June 10th, 1843, until June 28th, 1867, when she died, Lauren Byington and Julia P. Byington were husband and wife, living upon the land in suit, and using also adjoining land of Julia for their common family use. Prior to June 10th, 1843, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Bryan v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
  3. Smith v. PendellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
  4. Strong v. BenedictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824
  5. Griswold v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Dennen v. SearleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Shrout v. SealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Kennedy, Admr. v. Rutter, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. Barri v. Schwarz Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Tuffy v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API