Sam P. McGill v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
In this case we are called upon to decide how to fill a lacuna in the administrative review procedure under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq.: should consumers of a pesticide who oppose cancellation of all pesticide-use registrations have the right to prevent the indefinite suspension of a hearing under 7 U.S.C. § 136d(a) and (b) 1 when both the registrant of the pesticide uses and the Environmental Protection Agency have agreed to both the cancellations and the suspension?
The petitioners and the intervenors…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wisconsin v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Minneapolis Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Shamrock Oil and Gas Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Mobay Chemical Corp. v. CostleSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mobay Chemical Corp. v. CostleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Love v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. CostleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Nagel v. ThomasDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- Love v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Northwest Food Processors Ass'n v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.