Wisconsin v. Federal Power Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
Almost nine years have passed since this Court’s decision in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672, holding that the Federal Power Commission has jurisdiction over the rates charged by an independent producer of natural gas. The present case, involving *296the same independent producer, Phillips Petroleum (Phillips),1 is a sequel to that earlier decision and strikingly illustrates the unique problems confronting the Commission in its efforts to achieve the goal of effective regulation.
T.
Following the remand in the Phillips case, the Commission, proceeding under § 5 (a) of the Natural…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.