Legal Opinion
Love v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 29, 1988No. 87-3866PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
Farmers and food processors in the Pacific Northwest brought this lawsuit to enjoin the Environmental Protection Agency from suspending registrations of the pesticide dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4, 6-dinitrophe-nol). Plaintiffs use products containing dinoseb or its salts in the cultivation of green peas, snap beans, cucurbits and caneber-*1350ries.1 As counsel for the State of Oregon dramatically proclaimed at oral argument, this case “essentially is ... about whether we’ll be able to have raspberries next year.”
Facts
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. United States Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Blaine P. Thompson v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Longview Fibre Co. v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.