Legal Opinion

Joe Robertson and Addrue Robertson v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 12, 1965No. 393-62PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was referred pursuant ..to. Rule 57(a) to Trial Commissioner Wilson Cowen (now Chief Judge Cowen), with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on May 28, 1964. The plaintiffs have excepted to the opinion and certain of the findings of fact. The parties have filed briefs and the case has been submitted to the court without argument of counsel. The court agrees with the commissioner’s findings, his opinion and his recommended conclusion of law, as hereinafter set forth, and hereby…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  2. Matson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  3. Highland Park Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Highland Park, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Herring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. Goodman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API