Legal Opinion

Goodman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 28, 2011No. 09-839 LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

This takings case is currently before the coux’t on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pux'suant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Fedei'al Claims (RCFC). For the x’easons set forth herein, defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted.

BACKGROUND

In this ease, plaintiff alleges that defendant took an avigation easement over her property without just compensation in violation of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. More specifically, she argues that frequent…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Powell v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Prophet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. McClellan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API