Legal Opinion

Matson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 4, 1959No. 268-56PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Justice (Retired),

sitting by designation.

Plaintiffs are owners in fee of undivided interests in nine forty-acre contiguous plots in a section of land adjoining the municipal airport of Duluth, Minnesota.

This is an action to recover compensation for the taking of plaintiffs’ property by the United States through its use of the property’s navigable airspace, below minimum altitudes of' flight, between June 1952 and June 1956, when the petition was filed. 1 Plaintiffs’ petition sounds both in damages and as for a taking.

The facts are reported in detail in accompanying special findings.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization & AssessmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Grace E. Avery v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Batten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Alva A. Aaron v. The United States. Peter Andersen v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Lacey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API