Legal Opinion

Employment Security Commission v. Arizona Citrus Growers

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1944No. Civil No. 4537PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Superior Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether services rendered by cer tain employees of the Arizona Citrus Growers, a corporation, during the period‘in controversy. (January 1, 1940, .to June 16, 1941) were, as the law then stood, engaged in ‘‘agricultural labor” and therefore exempt from coverage under the Unemployment Compensation Law of 1936, as amended.

The appellee, the Arizona Citrus Growers, hereinafter referred to as the Association, is a corporation organized under the cooperative marketing laws of Arizona, Article 7, Section 49r-701, et seq., Arizona Code…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. H. Duys Co., Inc. v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Rutledge Co-Operative Ass'n v. BaughmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  5. Great Western Mushroom Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. California Employment Commission v. Butte County Rice Growers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Bade v. DrachmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. California Employment Commission v. KovacevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rodriquez v. TerryArizona Supreme Court · 1955

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API