Legal Opinion

H. Duys Co., Inc. v. Tone

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 8, 1939PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The named plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of dealing in leaf tobacco and among its other activities has conducted a tobacco warehouse in Hartford since 1933. The defendant, the state commissioner of labor and factory inspection, acting as administrator of the state Unemployment Compensation Act, General Statutes, 1937 Supplement, Chapter 280a, under authority of § 814d thereof, made an assessment against Duys & Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the corporation, based upon wages paid by it to persons employed at its Hartford warehouse in processing and handling shade…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for WomenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Morgan v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1942

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API