Legal Opinion
Hyatt Corporation, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1991No. 89-6407, 90-5697PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HACKETT, District Judge.
Petitioner, Hyatt Corporation (Hyatt or Petitioner), seeks review and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) seeks enforcement of the Board’s decision and order finding the petitioner to have violated sections 8(a)(1), (3), (4), and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or the Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1), (3), (4), and (5), during and after the successful union campaign at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Memphis, Tennessee. See, Hyatt Hotels Corp., 296 N.L.R.B. No. 36, 132 L.R.R.M. 1131 (August 25, 1989). We find, with one exception, that the decision…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Alvin Joel TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. McClain of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Ronnie Keeton v. Comm'r of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Goldtex, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Goldtex, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Intervenor v. Talsol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.