Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Intervenor v. Talsol Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1998No. 97-5443PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) petitions for enforcement of its order finding Talsol Corporation guilty of unfair labor practices. The Board adopted the conclusions of the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) that Talsol violated §§ 8(a)(1), (3) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (3) and (5). Talsol contests only three of the Board’s findings, and the Board seeks summary enforcement of its remaining findings of violations on the part of Talsol. Therefore, by virtue of a failure to contest findings,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Allied Products Corporation, Richard Brothers DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Hyatt Corporation, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Carrier Corporation, (84-5741), Pacemaker Driver Service, Inc., (84-5885) v. National Labor Relations Board, (84-5883), (84-5885)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ark Las Vegas Restaurant Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- National Labor Relations Board v. Caval Tool Division, Chromalloy Gas Turbine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. Main Street Terrace Care Center, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- No. 00-2825, 00-3758Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.