Legal Opinion
Garrison v. Pearlstein
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1924No. Civ. No. 4887PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action brought by the father to recover his damages occasioned by the accident which was the subject matter involved in the case of Garrison v. Pearlstein, ante, p. 326 [229 P. 348]. Judgment went for the plaintiff and the defendants have appealed.
[1] The action was commenced by John D. Garrison, the father of the minor boy. The appellants claim that the mother should have been joined as a party plaintiff. In this connection they cite section 197 of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Mertens v. Southern Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Busch v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Meeker ex rel. Meeker v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Bruce v. Western Pipe & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Maus v. Scavenger Protective Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Harris v. BeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Rockwood v. LansburghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.