Busch v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from orders denying motions for a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gray, Barker & Bowen, N. Blackstock, and Wheaton A. Gray, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant is operating two double track street railways in the city of Los Angeles, one along Pasadena Avenue and the other on Avenue 20, which crosses Pasadena Avenue. Reinhardt J. Busch and his wife, Mary E. Busch, were traveling easterly along the south side of Pasadena Avenue in an automobile driven by the said Mary E. Busch, and owned by her. A street-ear operated by the defendant was going westerly on the south track of the Pasadena Avenue line between Avenue 21 and Avenue 20, and at a point near Avenue 20 the automobile and the ear collided, whereby Reinhardt J. Busch sustained…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by18 opinions
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- W. States Gas & Elec. Co. v. Bayside Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Porter v. WilsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
- Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.