Legal Opinion

Trina Richardson v. Sunset Science Park Credit Union, a Federally Chartered Credit Union

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 2001No. 00-35342PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Trina Richardson contends on appeal that the district court incorrectly computed the amount of penalty wages owed to her, under state law, by Defendant Sunset Science Park Credit Union and incorrectly determined that she was not entitled to statutory damages under state law because of Defendant’s unlawful deduction from her paycheck. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant employed Plaintiff as a loan officer from August 13, 1995, through October 16, 1998. On September 25, 1998, Plaintiff gave Defendant two weeks’ notice…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Barner v. City of NovatoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Sabin v. Willamette-Western CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. William Hillis LISENBEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. I.C. Huanani HENRY, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Kling v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Taylor v. Delatoore, Deputy Huges, Deputy Unknown Duncan, Sgt. Rogers, Lt. Eriquez, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Schmidt v. JohnstoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  3. Aranda v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Scott Schutza v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API