Legal Opinion

Aranda v. Department of Social & Health Services

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2003No. 03-15056; D.C. No. CV-00-06116-RECPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Roque Aranda, a pro se prisoner, appeals the sua sponte dismissal of his action alleging claims under the Federal Torts Claim Act, (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680; the Alien Tort Claims Act (“ATCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1350; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3); and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court’s decision to dismiss under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) is reviewed de novo. Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1195 (9th…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.