Legal Opinion
Chinosi v. Kringstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, etc., the defendants Mark Coffiner and Endodontic Associates at Hanson Flace, EC., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated April 15, 2003, which denied their motion pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against them as time-barred.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellants made out a prima facie case that their treatment of the plaintiff ended on April 10, 1998, rendering this action, which was commenced November 14, 2000, untimely as to them…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cox v. Kingsboro Medical GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Savarese v. ShatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Siegel v. WankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Gravel v. CicolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LaRocca v. DeRiccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Piro v. MacuraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Piro v. MacuraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009