Legal Opinion
Savarese v. Shatz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 2000PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants Phillip Shatz and McCabe & Mack appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (LaCava, J.), dated August 25, 1999, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as untimely insofar as asserted against them.
*220Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
To dismiss a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Siegel v. WankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Hoosac Valley Farmers Exchange, Inc. v. AG Assets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Assad v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ainbinder v. JacobiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by39 opinions
- Swift v. New York Medical CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Fleetwood Agency, Inc. v. Verde Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rakusin v. MianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Kennedy v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gravel v. CicolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.