Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Wank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1992PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Crew III, J.

On July 12, 1988 defendant Jeffrey A. Watson and defendant Harvey Wank (hereinafter defendant), an oral surgeon licensed to practice in both this State and Pennsylvania, performed dental implant surgery on plaintiff in the City of Syracuse, Onondaga County. Following the surgery, plaintiff allegedly experienced various complications and underwent certain additional procedures. Plaintiff thereafter commenced this action for dental malpractice against Watson and defendant; defendant was served with a summons with notice on February 15, 1991 in Pennsylvania.1…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Gomez v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Savarese v. ShatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Gizzi v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Gravel v. CicolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Assad v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API