Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Gordon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1888No. 2536PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from Austin. Tried below before the Hon. H. Teichmueller.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

The appellee, while in the -employment of the appellant as a locomotive engineer, was injured in the derailment of the locomotive which he was operating, and this action was brought to recover damages. Tt is alleged that the injuries resulted from defects in the railway track and locomotive, and damages actual to the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars and exemplary for a like sum were claimed. There was a judgment in favor of the appellee. The defendant pleaded matters in bar of the action, which it is claimed operate as an accord and satisfaction of the claim…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. BoehmTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Coffee v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PortwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Reeves v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ferguson-McKinney Dry Goods Co. v. GarrettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Simms Oil Co. v. American Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API