Legal Opinion

Diaz-Romero v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 31, 2008No. 07-1607PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

The district court dismissed the complaint of Wilfredo Diaz-Romero for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm because Diaz-Romero’s status as a commissioned officer of the Public Health Service (“PHS”) bars his suit for service connected injuries.

I. Facts

Because the complaint was resolved on a motion to dismiss, the facts are set forth as alleged in the complaint and inferences taken in the light most favorable to Diaz-Romero, the non-moving party. Rodriguez-Ortiz v. Margo Caribe, Inc., 490 F.3d 92, 94 (1st Cir.2007).

Wilfredo Diaz-Romero was a commissioned…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rivera-Concepción v. CommonwealthDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
  2. Torres-Santiago v. Díaz-CasianoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
  3. B.J. Tidwell Industries, Inc. v. ZawackiDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
  4. Ortiz Osorio v. Municipality of LoizaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  5. Alvisuriz v. BjorkmanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API