Legal Opinion

Barahona v. Union Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 2018No. 16-56562PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLOCK, District Judge:

For more than half a century, the Union Pacific Railroad (“Union Pacific”) has leased land under 1,800 miles of its right of way to Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, L.P. (“SFPP”), which uses the land for a petroleum pipeline. In a suit by landowners challenging Union Pacific’s ability to lease the land, the district court held that (1) the acts of Congress conferring the right of way authorized Union Pacific to use the right of way only for a “railroad purpose,” and (2) the pipeline did not serve such a purpose. It then certified those issues for interlocutory review…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Sweaney v. Ada CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
  2. Alaska Railroad Corporation v. Flying Crown Subdivision Addition No. 1 & No. 2Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. (PS) Kidgell v. County of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Abas Dowlad v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  5. Ahtna Design-Build, Inc. v. Asphalt Surfacing, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2024

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API