Legal Opinion

Paul Isaacson v. Tom Horne

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2013No. 12-16670PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1217OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Our question is whether the Constitution permits the Arizona legislature to prohibit abortion beginning at twenty weeks gestation, before the fetus is viable. We hold that it does not.

Arizona House Bill 2036 (“H.B.2036” or “the Act”), enacted in April 2012, forbids, except in a medical emergency, abortion of a fetus determined to be of a gestational age of at least twenty weeks. Arizona law separately prohibits abortions after fetal viability unless necessary to preserve the pregnant woman’s life or health. See Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 36-2301.01(A)(l). The challenged…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Victor K. Williams v. Jacob LewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  3. Jennie McCormack v. Stephen HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Planned Parenthood of Arizona v. William HumbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API