Legal Opinion

Miller v. Cranston

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1940No. Civ. 2485PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs and appellants to recover damages for personal injuries received by reason of an automobile collision. The case was tried before a court sitting with a jury. The jury returned its unanimous verdict in favor of the defendant and respondent George E. Cranston. The other named defendants sued herein were fictitious. An appropriate judgment conforming to the verdict was entered. A motion for a new trial was denied. Appellants have appealed from the judgment.

On August 5, 1939, at 3 o’clock p. m., respondent was driving his car, accompanied by his wife, in a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Donat v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Scandalis v. JennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Roselle v. BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Cordova v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API