Legal Opinion

Drysdale v. Estate of Drysdale

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1985No. WD 35778PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUGENT, Judge.

The defendant executrix of the estate of Mabel Drysdale appeals from a judgment directing specific performance by the executrix of decedent’s contract for the sale of a farm to plaintiffs Stephen and Helen Drysdale. We affirm the judgment.

The defendant complains that the trial court erred in finding that the plaintiffs had performed their part of the contract because, she asserts, plaintiffs’ own uncon-troverted evidence at best established that they had refused to pay nearly one-fourth of the contract price.

On November 12, 1970, Leonard and Mabel Drysdale agreed to sell a 328.5…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Downs v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Lancaster v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Leffler v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jhala v. PatelMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Crow v. BertramMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Carroll v. GhidoniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API