Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Ghidoni

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1987No. 51784PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Appeal by plaintiff Carroll from the court’s “Amended Order on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Settlement” finding the parties had settled their case. We affirm.

A “business-love-arrangement” of the parties turned into “apparent-hate-separation.” Plaintiff Carroll and defendant Ghi-doni had been partners in a crane and hoist repairing business, but had a “falling-out.” On May 1, 1979, Carroll filed suit against Ghidoni alleging a rupture of their business relationship. On May 11, 1979, the parties executed a “Stipulation and Agreement” setting out the rights and liabilities of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Wenneker v. FragerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RoussinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Freshour v. SchuerenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Langley v. LangleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenblum v. Jacks or Better of America West Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Highley v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. McPherson Redevelopment Corp. v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API