Legal Opinion

Crow v. Bertram

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1987No. 51700PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-vendor appeals from the judgment of the trial court, sitting as trier of fact, granting plaintiff-purchaser specific performance of a contract to convey real estate and ordering vendor to account to co-defendant real estate broker for a sales commission.

On March 1, 1973, defendant-vendor Garland Bertram (hereinafter “Vendor”) entered into a contract with the North Central Land Company for the sale of vendor’s 940 acre farm in Monroe County located *635along the Mark Twain Lake. At the time of the sales contract, all parties contemplated that a portion of this land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anson v. TietzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. Miran Investment Co. v. Medical West Building Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Adams v. KerrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Crow v. BertramMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Drysdale v. Estate of DrysdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holtmeier v. DayaniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Kassebaum v. KassebaumMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Land Improvement, Inc. v. FergusonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hy-Test, Inc. v. New England Safety Shoe Co. (In Re Interco Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API