Legal Opinion

Shelby Scovill and Kody Maynard, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Siemens Mobility, Inc., and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 3, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01081Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SHELBY SCOVILL and KODY 10 MAYNARD, individually and on behalf of No. 2:25-cv-01081-TLN-SCR 11 all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Siemens Mobility, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) 19 Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiffs Shelby Scovill and Kody Maynard (collectively, 20 “Plaintiffs”) submitted an opposition. (ECF No. 19.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 20.) 21 For the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API