Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 12, 1985No. 40, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case involves a constitutional challenge to the legal sufficiency of the statutory form of charging document for the crime of theft, as authorized by Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol.), Art. 27, § 344(a).

I

By chapter 849 of the Acts of 1978, codified as §§ 340-344 of Art. 27, the General Assembly of Maryland, effective July 1, 1979, consolidated a number of theft-related offenses (not involving force or coercion) into a single newly created statutory offense known as theft. Section 341 specifies that “[c]onduct designated as theft” under the Act’s…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Wildermuth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API