Jones v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
This case involves a constitutional challenge to the legal sufficiency of the statutory form of charging document for the crime of theft, as authorized by Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol.), Art. 27, § 344(a).
I
By chapter 849 of the Acts of 1978, codified as §§ 340-344 of Art. 27, the General Assembly of Maryland, effective July 1, 1979, consolidated a number of theft-related offenses (not involving force or coercion) into a single newly created statutory offense known as theft. Section 341 specifies that “[c]onduct designated as theft” under the Act’s…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Wildermuth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.