Legal Opinion

Hagans v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 30, 1989No. 41, September Term, 1988. No. 95, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The two criminal cases before us were entirely separate prosecutions, for unrelated offenses, in different counties, at different times, and involving different defendants. Nevertheless, the only issue presented in the Hagans case, and the principal issue presented in the Allen case, are identical. It is whether, as a matter of Maryland common law, a defendant ordinarily can be convicted of an offense which is not charged but which is a lesser included offense of one that is charged. Because of this common issue, we shall decide both cases in one opinion.

I

The facts in each…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Monoker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API