Wildermuth v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
In separate jury trials in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, appellants Richard Bryan Wildermuth and James Sylvester McKoy were each convicted of and sentenced for, among other things, child abuse. In each case the alleged child victim was permitted to testify from outside the courtroom via closed-circuit television, pursuant to Annotated Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, § 9-102 (1984 RepLVol., 1986 Supp.). Each appellant now launches a multifaceted attack on his convictions. 1 The central thrust in each case is the contention that § 9-102 is…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.