Dietary Supplemental Coalition, Inc. The Health Haus, Inc. v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D. David A. Kessler, Commissioner of Food and Drug Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether the Food and Drug Administration’s classification of dietary supplement Co-enzyme Q10 (“CoQlO”) is an issue ripe for judicial review. The district court dismissed plaintiff’s action for declaratory judgment on the grounds that 1) the issue raised was not purely legal; 2) the challenged action was not final; and 3) the plaintiffs had not exhausted their administrative remedies, 796 F.Supp. 441. Plaintiffs timely appeal. We affirm.
I
Plaintiffs-appellants are a coalition of dietary supplement manufacturers, known as the Dietary Supplement Coalition, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Don Kirshner, and Schumaier, Roberts & McKinsey v. Uniden Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Biotics Research Corporation v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc., Seroyal Brands, Inc. v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Schering Corporation v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Oregon Natural Desert Association v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments, Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Lacey v. C.S.P. Solano Medical StaffDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.